Comments for Mad (Data) Scientist
https://matloff.wordpress.com
Musings, useful code etc. on R and data scienceThu, 19 Dec 2019 14:10:26 +0000
hourly
1 http://wordpress.com/
Comment on Neural Networks Are Essentially Polynomial Regression by Neural Networks Are Essentially Polynomial Regression - Actionable Insights
https://matloff.wordpress.com/2018/06/20/neural-networks-are-essentially-polynomial-regression/comment-page-1/#comment-26904
Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:10:26 +0000http://matloff.wordpress.com/?p=2087#comment-26904[…] article was first published on Mad (Data) Scientist, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page […]
]]>
Comment on Heteroscedasticity in Regression — It Matters! by Anonymous
https://matloff.wordpress.com/2015/06/07/heteroscedasticity-in-regression-it-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-26894
Fri, 13 Dec 2019 22:30:20 +0000http://matloff.wordpress.com/?p=568#comment-26894This is a great trick. I found that it doesn’t work as-is these days. But it does after I add a few lines to set the rownames and colnames of the matrix returned by vcovHC to those of the original non-HC matrix as returned by vcov(nlslmout).
]]>
Comment on The freqparcoord Package for Multivariate Visualization by R Data Science Tutorials - 算法网
https://matloff.wordpress.com/2014/03/30/the-freqparcoord-package-for-multivariate-visualization/comment-page-1/#comment-26687
Sun, 20 Oct 2019 12:07:48 +0000http://matloff.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-26687[…] THE FREQPARCOORD PACKAGE FOR MULTIVARIATE VISUALIZATION […]
]]>
Comment on Some Comments on Donoho’s “50 Years of Data Science” by Khan Faisal
https://matloff.wordpress.com/2016/01/23/some-comments-on-donahos-50-years-of-data-science/comment-page-1/#comment-26590
Tue, 24 Sep 2019 04:43:58 +0000http://matloff.wordpress.com/?p=945#comment-26590amazing and motivational article to come in the feild of data science.
]]>
Comment on Some Comments on Donoho’s “50 Years of Data Science” by Sufiyan Sheikh
https://matloff.wordpress.com/2016/01/23/some-comments-on-donahos-50-years-of-data-science/comment-page-1/#comment-26589
Tue, 24 Sep 2019 04:37:51 +0000http://matloff.wordpress.com/?p=945#comment-26589Data science is really a good feild and this have amzing blog and articles about it.
]]>
Comment on R Journal July Issue by R Journal July Issue – Data Science Austria
https://matloff.wordpress.com/2019/08/26/r-journal-july-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-26551
Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:52:38 +0000http://matloff.wordpress.com/?p=2163#comment-26551[…] by data_admin [This article was first published on Mad (Data) Scientist, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page […]
]]>
Comment on New Version of regtools package by New Version of regtools package – Data Science Austria
https://matloff.wordpress.com/2019/08/25/new-version-of-regtools-package/comment-page-1/#comment-26550
Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:59:28 +0000http://matloff.wordpress.com/?p=2156#comment-26550[…] by data_admin [This article was first published on Mad (Data) Scientist, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page […]
]]>
Comment on Neural Networks Are Essentially Polynomial Regression by matloff
https://matloff.wordpress.com/2018/06/20/neural-networks-are-essentially-polynomial-regression/comment-page-1/#comment-26525
Tue, 03 Sep 2019 03:06:20 +0000http://matloff.wordpress.com/?p=2087#comment-26525Don’t know, hadn’t heard of it before you brought it up. Your “cold fusion” comment is spot on for the machine learning field 🙂 , in my opinion, and my first reaction is the GMDH may be the same, but I really need to lookinto this.
]]>
Comment on Neural Networks Are Essentially Polynomial Regression by BPT
https://matloff.wordpress.com/2018/06/20/neural-networks-are-essentially-polynomial-regression/comment-page-1/#comment-26524
Tue, 03 Sep 2019 02:02:40 +0000http://matloff.wordpress.com/?p=2087#comment-26524Would you be willing to comment on the GMDH methods as compared to polynomial regression and the relevance of your work to the topic? GMDH sounds at least superficially related, but it seems that people who promote GMDH are somewhat walled off from the rest of the statistical modelling community, making it difficult for an outsider like me to judge if GMDH is to statistics as cold fusion is to physics, or if it’s a mundane thing made to sound profound, or if it’s something meriting serious further study.
]]>
Comment on Neural Networks Are Essentially Polynomial Regression by Tech roundup 38: a journal published by a bot - Javi López G.
https://matloff.wordpress.com/2018/06/20/neural-networks-are-essentially-polynomial-regression/comment-page-1/#comment-26510
Sat, 31 Aug 2019 08:19:49 +0000http://matloff.wordpress.com/?p=2087#comment-26510[…] Neural Networks Are Essentially Polynomial Regression […]
]]>